Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 91-105 of 959
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  If we have agreed to this principle already, this question between divisions and stations....

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Then my question specifically is, if the language then changed, the other elector resides in the polling division. Does that satisfy the “not living within the polling station” concerns?

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  With that similar language...?

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I want the language to be clear. Perhaps, then, we're into a subamendment conversation.

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Associated with that polling station....

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It's because we changed NDP-8.

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Thank you, Chair. I'll start with our officials. The language is about vouching, as I understand what has been proposed. It's about somebody in the same electoral district being able to vouch for somebody else.

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  One of the polling divisions within the same electoral district.

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Right. We're back to the grouping again?

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It's not novel, but it's the new introduction where these would be allowed. We're in the gym. There are several.... We didn't call it a polling place. Remind me of the terminology.

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It would allow somebody, as they're in different divisions but in the same polling station, to be able to vouch for somebody else.

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Again, we're looking at having voters vote in this similar but new way. If somebody comes in and says, “I'd like to vouch for this person; they're my neighbour", as it currently stands, if they're not in the exact same polling division, that vouching is not valid. Is that right?

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  This is the electoral district situation. We've had some conversation. I'm not sure what the consequence of the previous conversations might be on NDP-26, so I'll just give you a second.

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I will hold my breath until you determine that.

October 18th, 2018Committee meeting

Nathan CullenNDP