Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Health committee There are two things, and I think Phil touched on this. Peer review is very important for scientific journals, and when you're talking about medicine and therapeutics, peer review, when it comes to economic analysis, is more around research methodology, but they don't really typi
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee No, the number hasn't changed much. We are between 9,500 and 9,800 storefronts. There is some shifting, some closing of smaller locations and consolidation into bigger enterprises, but there hasn't been a plethora of....
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee It may or may not. It's possible.
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee No.
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee No, it was not.
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee Can I answer that?
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee Sure. I think you're reading something that was probably written six months or so ago, when up to that point no other models had really been under serious consideration nationally. The ones we put forward in our paper would be the Quebec model, which was discussed earlier today,
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee It's not a matter of what I think. It was the consultant who is the expert in the field who thought that was the appropriate price, and we have no reason to question it.
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee Yes.
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee That wasn't for pharmacists' services. There's a separate conversation around pharmacists' services, which I alluded to. They have not been costed. That's the medication management and the medication adherence.
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee You don't have to. We highly recommend that you do. There's not much point in having a national pharmacare program if you're not ensuring that people are using medications appropriately.
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee Of course. Yes, we did.
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee That was the researcher's perspective.
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee Absolutely. We were, again, just putting the facts on the table. Mechanically, that's a transfer of costs of $6.6 billion. How the government manages to offset that, or partially offset it, is completely up to the managers.
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid
Health committee It doesn't have to. Again, we're not for or against a fully public-paid program. We wanted to put some facts on the table. Any national pharmacare program can work effectively as long as it has the patient's interest in mind, ultimately, and not just cost savings.
May 16th, 2016Committee meeting
Perry Eisenschmid