Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 86
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Government Operations committee  There are a lot of good questions in there, so let me try to answer them all. In terms of the way it's structured with respect to ministers, first of all they get a mandate letter that sets out the things that the Prime Minister expects them to do. In the current structure of th

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  The mandate letters are the central articulation of the expectations of the Prime Minister in terms of the responsibilities for each minister, and certainly there's nothing in this statute that touches on what's in the mandate letters.

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  It formalizes the Prime Minister's idea of a one-tier government and solidifies the structure of the ministry, which was stood up with the available legislative frameworks on day one. This formalizes the foundation and the structure.

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  First of all, I'm not a privy councillor. I'm a public servant who works in the Privy Council Office. I do a number of functions within the PCO. Did you want me to run through those?

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  As a public servant, I'm not sure how far I can go commenting on a caucus statement. In answer to your question, I think the minister laid out the rationale for the integration of the RDAs earlier, which I think is what you're getting at, about them having one minister. On that f

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  This legislation doesn't create any new departments. As for the cost of the ministers themselves, it's just a question of the same amount of money being paid through a different vehicle. It will come through the Salaries Act rather than coming through appropriations for the group

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  There are basically three things the legislation does. First, it puts into legislation what's in practice in the ministry. This is something earlier governments have done; it's not an unusual thing. It also solidifies the one-tier ministry approach where everyone is on the same

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  You may be thinking of a dimension I'm not aware of. It will solidify the existing practice of how ministries are structured, but I don't see a significant change in the area you're describing. Perhaps if you could direct me to a specific point I'm missing, I'd be able to respond

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  You're asking why ministers of state aren't removed as a possibility for future governments? Is that—

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  A number of questions have been asked that go to the raw question of what this does. I think the best I could do in summing that up is it comes down to three things, first of all, formalizing the cabinet in—

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  There is a series of rearrangements of powers, duties, and functions you can do in terms of ministers of state. You're quite correct in saying that this legislation actually allows for the same thing to happen in terms of the listed ministers in terms of the act. It allows for t

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  I have a couple of thoughts in response. First, I think, in terms of the broad strokes of the bill, the intent is to formalize in legislation the ministry, as has been done a number of times over the past few ministries. In terms of the link between a minister and a department, I

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  What I was just going to point out, if I could, is that there are other examples of ministries, for example ESDC, where you have two ministers within the confines of one department. There are existing examples of what you're talking about.

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  Mr. McCauley, if I could just come back to the first question you raised, if I understood correctly, you indicated that there was some issue in the first couple of weeks. We can certainly undertake to look into that. My understanding is ministers were paid the same from day one,

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan

Government Operations committee  All of the ministers have been paid the same salary since day one. What is going to change is the funding mechanism, if you will. For ministers who are appointed under the Salaries Act, those funds flow from the consolidated revenue fund. For ministers of state, funds flow unde

October 5th, 2017Committee meeting

Ian McCowan