Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 130
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

National Defence committee  The way it works is that there are persons designated as weapons release authorities in the U.S., and there are no Canadians who have those authorities. There is always somebody who is able to make that decision on the U.S. side.

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  What I was talking about until 2025 was the state of our north warning system. I don't recall it being related to EMP per se. What I can offer to you is that in the NORAD sense, in terms of continuity of operations, we have EMP protection where it counts.

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  I recall this incident vaguely. Our mission is maritime warning, so it is largely an intelligence mission. There's quite a bit of analysis in order for us to declare something in our maritime lines of communication to be a matter for an advisory or warning. Whether those ships me

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  It's very difficult to decide. We are a force employer and when it comes to discussions about BMD, the policy set is clear for us: we're not a part of it. To speculate as to how it would look, I think that probably I would not be able to bring any accuracies or any information on

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  Again, it would depend on the policy and the end result of the arrangement, which would be, again, very speculative at this time.

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  I would qualify it more. There is a section of that room with consoles that only Americans are manning. It is not sectioned off. It is a part of the operations centre, but Canadians are not manning those stations.

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  I'll refer to earlier remarks. NORAD modernization is pursued under the tri-command framework, and that is to signify, as the words in the policy say—“defence against all perils or threats”—that we are concerned with multi-domain approaches to North America. The main concern in t

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  It is about generally modernizing NORAD. It is about materiel solutions and non-materiel solutions—you've heard those terms before. It is about the commanders who jointly are responsible for continental defence, namely the Americans and the Canadians, coming together and asking t

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  It is, sir, and it is at the command level at this time.

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  Throughout the United States we have 300 members, more or less, in uniform. In Colorado Springs per se we have 145 or 147—so it varies—along with their families.

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  That is fair to say, sir.

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  That is fair to say.

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  I don't know, because we have not engaged in those discussions. As you know, the policy is set and we're not a part of BMD, so I cannot comment on that.

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand

National Defence committee  That's right.

September 14th, 2017Committee meeting

LGen Pierre St-Amand