Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 17
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  Are you referring to regular members?

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  Bill C-42 will give Treasury Board the power to incorporate them into the public service at a later date. This is something that means that Bill C-7 contains specific provisions with regard to civilian members. And we do not know what the government's intention is concerning our

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  Your question is very timely, since I was a member of the national health and safety committee along with my colleague Mr. Brian SauvĂ©, who testified last Thursday and is present today. As it happens, we discussed health issues and other similar things. At a certain time, the RCM

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  The short answer is that those people are almost all hired locally and they work in the same place where they were hired. We RCMP members are transferred from one province or one territory to another, and sometimes outside the country, and health care services are not the same i

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  I would like to emphasize the fact that we are also paid to go toward the danger, contrary to other citizens, who run away from danger.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  With regard to health in the workplace, given that we move from province to province, our situation is different from that of police officers who work for the Ontario Provincial Police, for example. And yet, the OPP does exactly the same work as the RCMP. Officers in the OPP must

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  Yes. A few years ago, it was current practice in Quebec to use temporary police officers. Certain cities wanted there to be a collective agreement or a separate salary scale for temporary officers, as compared to permanent officers, which left open the possibility of a grandfathe

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  Currently, I am the only member in my unit that is not an officer. Three of my unit members are superintendents or chief superintendents. We are the four remaining members.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  Maybe I can comment on that. We have the Duxbury report, the Brown report, and the Robichaud report from C Division. All these reports mention that there is a dichotomy in the RCMP and that the officers have a different point of view of what is actually going on within the RCMP

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  Actually, Bill C-7 restricts these elements. What I am suggesting is that you remove all of those restrictions and leave it to the membership to decide which ones are important or not at the negotiation table.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  If you look at my speech, what I'm saying essentially is that our working conditions contain three elements. There is pay and benefits, but there are also officer safety elements, and then there are elements of protection against abuse from authority, which means a proper workpla

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  No, I do take offence to those being restricted. There should be no restrictions.

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  No, because Bill C-7, the way it's written, uses the wording that was in Bill C-43 in June 2010, even before the Supreme Court rendered its decision. What I believe and what the AMPMQ says is that this is not a list.... The list does not reflect what's important for members. Ther

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  I would like to say something to help you understand the situation. Our goal is to ensure that everything is on the table, and that we have the opportunity to negotiate all of these issues. It is important to remember that the government plays a double role as both legislator an

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis

Public Safety committee  Yes, I can do that for you. The separation of the elements that are in Bill C-7 is not our separation, but the employer's separation. We feel that uniform and equipment, as well as control techniques and certain other elements, such as minimum standards of policing, are all part

April 19th, 2016Committee meeting

Paul Dupuis