Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-24 of 24
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Electoral Reform committee  I think we certainly need to do that. Some of the polling evidence, which perhaps others have cited in testimony before the committee—I know André Blais was here this morning, but I did not hear his testimony, so whether he was able to cite some of this or not, I'm not sure....

July 27th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Larry LeDuc

Electoral Reform committee  I agree with almost everything you have just said. I think it reinforces Leslie Seidle's point about the importance of public education, which he made in response to the earlier question. On an issue like this, you can't really expect people to know a lot about different electora

July 27th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Larry LeDuc

Electoral Reform committee  National referendums, yes. Constructing an argument that it is a requirement somehow of a major change is a bit of a stretch for me. Whether it's a good idea along the line you were suggesting to build legitimacy, that's a normative question. We could probably kick that back an

July 27th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Larry LeDuc

July 27th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Larry LeDuc

Electoral Reform committee  I'm not sure I would use the word “requirement”. If it's a constitutional question, the constitutional lawyers are better qualified to comment on that than I am. I've heard the words “constitutional architecture” tossed around more recently and that goes in circles, and no one is

July 27th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Larry LeDuc

Electoral Reform committee  I don't think I've said anything particularly negative about referendums per se. It depends on what you want out of a referendum. One of the lessons I wanted to try to draw out of the New Zealand case is that the referendums—and they actually had two of them—were part of a larger

July 27th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Larry LeDuc

Electoral Reform committee  Yes, have had or can have, but that doesn't mean that they have to.

July 27th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Larry LeDuc

Electoral Reform committee  My negative example...I wrote that paper right around the time of the British referendum on the alternative vote. You have to understand, first of all, the government's purpose—or at least the Conservative half of the government's purpose—in that referendum was to basically defea

July 27th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Larry LeDuc

Electoral Reform committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you to members of the committee for inviting me here today. I was trying to decide how to start, particularly in a 10-minute beginning. I was going to start by saying that I think it's very unlikely that electoral reform will happen in Canada. And t

July 27th, 2016Committee meeting

Professor Larry LeDuc