Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 38
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Electoral Reform committee  There are a thousand different permutations. In fact, there are 193 electoral systems around the world.

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  Strategic voting is voting not with the party that you support, but voting because of the tactics of who you think is going to win in that constituency. Under any system where you have many parties in a single-member district, people are going to look at the polls, they're going

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  Different countries have different problems that they're facing right now. In the United States, the key issue is party polarization, where parties and politicians won't talk to each other, and there's all sorts of fundamental gridlocks, as we've mentioned, between the Senate, Co

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  Fairness to voters is normally understood by everybody as a share of the votes going to a share of the seats. So any system that is majoritarian systematically penalizes the parties that are in third, fourth and fifth place, and always gives a winner's bonus, an exaggerated bonus

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  Normally under PR, you'd increase the number of MPs per district, which means that the size of the ridings would have to be consolidated. You might have, for example, a district that now would be, say, Montreal versus different parts or particular cities in Toronto. Normally you

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  They can go together, and what matters is the size of the district magnitude. If you have a small district—Spain has three-to-five, Ireland has five—then essentially the individual voter can find, in particular, not just an MP but a couple of MPs, perhaps from different parties,

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  You don't want to create a new cleavage between urban voters and rural voters. That could create all sorts of problems where some have one set of representation and the others have another set. You can think about the boundaries and be more imaginative about how you would draw th

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  I'd go along with all three. PR normally increases the number of women automatically through the incentive that we mentioned. Quota systems are also good, although sometimes difficult to implement under first past the post, but they can be done. For example, they've been used in

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  You want to get rid of partisan interests to get this sort of consensus. For that reason, I might depart from my colleagues to say that an election that has to be on party grounds in the first place is a problem when you're dealing with constitutional issues. Backbenchers might n

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  I have a quick response. Think about the U.K. right now, which has six electoral systems that it's working with quite happily. You have first past the post for Westminster, you have a party list for Europe, you have additional vote for the mayor of London, and you have AMS in Sco

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  Strategic voting is all about the size of the party and your calculations for whether or not your core party, the one you really support, is going to win or not. You do that under every system. There's a marvellous book by Gary Cox about strategic voting. It's slightly more comm

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  Deliberation takes time, especially since, as we've mentioned earlier, people don't know about other systems. The best answer is to have more flexibility to abandon the deadline, which was an early promise made, I'd argue, without a lot of thought about what the consequences migh

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  Some of the problems you mentioned are there in western democracies. It's not really about either a majoritarian system or PR. A crisis of confidence in parliaments and their role and their power is very much affected by globalization and the loss of sovereignty of countries, whi

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  The first point is absolutely right. Smaller parties would likely become better represented, such as the Greens in Canada, because they'd get a more proportional share of seats, depending on how that works through. How does it affect the members? This is a complicated question.

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris

Electoral Reform committee  On that last point on representation, you also have think about minor parties. The old idea of parliamentary representation is that you go through your MP, and irrespective of party, you are representing the constituency you're a member of. It does mean that small parties are exc

August 23rd, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Pippa Norris