Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-30 of 39
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Electoral Reform committee  That would be up to the parties. Ideally, parties would have open nomination contests and come up with a system where either they would, based on a plurality vote, take the top two candidates, or they would allow a ranked ballot in their process and take the top two based on that

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

Electoral Reform committee  No, I don't think so. I think most of what we've covered today is what we covered there. Of course, the constitutional issues didn't come up in P.E.I., because they don't apply, but in terms of the questions on the system, we've covered a lot of what was covered in those discussi

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

Electoral Reform committee  Sure. By merit, I mean by how many votes they received. For example, let's go back to the Liberal Party needing 10 more seats. The top performer in, let's say, western Canada for the Liberal Party at that point in time, may have 30% of the vote. So 30% of the vote for the Liberal

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

Electoral Reform committee  No, it would be merit in terms of how they performed at the polls.

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

Electoral Reform committee  I currently work with the Alberta government as a policy researcher.

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

Electoral Reform committee  Take a case where a party thinks it doesn't have the opportunity to win both seats, and let's say it anticipates coming in third place. In that case, they would probably deem it more reasonable to allocate all three resources to one candidate. The one candidate gives the party th

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

Electoral Reform committee  I ran simulations for the past five federal elections, and each one takes about 60 seconds to determine the outcome.

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

Electoral Reform committee  The thing that took awhile was writing the program to do it. The steps are mathematically simple. It's just you're doing it on a large scale with 100 ridings in each region, roughly. That's not the difficulty. The thing that you would have to wait for is for all the votes to come

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

Electoral Reform committee  No. Each region would be a unique entity. Only votes in the Atlantic region would count towards the results in Atlantic Canada, and the same for all the other regions.

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

Electoral Reform committee  The only complaints that I've run into that I see merit in for some people is the fact that for some of these second MPs, most of them would be elected in second place, so you elect the first-place candidate and the second-place candidate from each district. In a small minority o

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

Electoral Reform committee  That's a bit of a misrepresentation of what would happen. The voter in Saskatchewan would participate into equal weight as someone in Alberta for the regional voting results. The regional voting results allocate the seats to each party on a proportional basis, and the allocation

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham

Electoral Reform committee  Yes, I understand the question. There would be complete clarity on that. Candidates would have run and received votes only from people within their districts. They would be elected largely based on the votes within that district, so it would be completely clear who a candidate r

September 29th, 2016Committee meeting

Sean Graham