Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 31-45 of 46
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Government Operations committee  I would have to look at the specifics of that, so I can come back to you on that in particular. For the modelling exercise, I wasn't overseeing that at the time, but I've reviewed the work and I stand behind it, of course. That was the specific assumption of how cost adjustments

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  It's kind of an obvious—

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  I can't suggest that, because I haven't done the actual math behind it, and that's not my role. My role is just to take from the analysis—

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  I'm just saying this is the elephant in the room. If you change that—the break they have right now, the deferral—that would change the nature of the whole financial sustainability of Canada Post for sure.

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  These rules exist for a reason.

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  The short answer is that there were some changes implemented by Canada Post, so that what we anticipated for 2020 wouldn't be the outcome. There was a postal transformation process with incremental changes—the community mailbox, for example. Some of the scenarios, in fact, that w

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  Exactly. The price increase, labour, service, community mailbox—all those things were measured as part of the scenario.

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  Yes, and I think the big elephant in the room is the pension issue, something that we had put aside assuming that it could be solved somehow, but it's going to have to be dealt with.

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  The full transfer—

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  No. Actually, in the six scenarios we put forward around the wage, that was unrealistic. It was just to indicate the magnitude of the challenge. With regard to alternate-day delivery, I know Ernst & Young came out with saying that there would a small potential gain from that.

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  Our first observation is that the challenge is enormous. Changes are being made to the business model, which, as I mentioned earlier, promotes efficiency gains while maintaining service. Then it remains to be seen what service Canadians expect and how to adjust the business mode

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  The 2013 year was the second year in which Canada Post incurred an operating loss. In the basic scenario that we had prepared at the time, including changes planned as part of the so-called postal transformation initiative implemented by Canada Post, the corporation posted a prof

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  We did not make any comparisons of its cost structure with those of other postal services.

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault

Government Operations committee  The challenge in that type of exercise is always to establish an order of magnitude since there are a lot of potential solutions. Here we have six scenarios, and none of them managed to fill the financial gap. We realize we have to take a broader view. There is a range of initiat

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Louis Thériault