Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-8 of 8
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Electoral Reform committee  I won't take much time. These are a few points I couldn't make this morning because my time ran out. To me, it's fundamentally unfair and undemocratic when a party receives 50% of the vote and has 100% control in Parliament. There's something wrong with that scenario. Throughout

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

John Gagnon

Electoral Reform committee  On a point of privilege, you made reference to mixed proportional representation when I was talking about—

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

John Gagnon

Electoral Reform committee  Yes. My presentation was not on mixed; it was on proportional representation. What I was referring to was the open list—

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

John Gagnon

Electoral Reform committee  —which is consistent with proportional representation. I want to make sure that you're clear on that, and to clarify that.

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

John Gagnon

Electoral Reform committee  No. There's nothing wrong with mixed proportional representation, but our preference is true proportional representation.

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

John Gagnon

Electoral Reform committee  I don't have a problem with the other one either.

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

John Gagnon

Electoral Reform committee  Yes. Thank you.

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

John Gagnon

Electoral Reform committee  Good day. I'm John Gagnon representing the New Brunswick Federation of Labour. I'm going to speak on proportional representation. We believe that a thorough consultation of Canadians is necessary. This consultation could take many forms, town hall meetings, the forum we have tod

October 7th, 2016Committee meeting

John Gagnon