Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-12 of 12
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Citizenship and Immigration committee  As I indicated before, in discussing the question of the family class generally, I think that if you want to assess the economic impact of the presence of the people in Canada, then you can't look only at their earnings. You have to look at the earnings of the family unit, at a m

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz

Citizenship and Immigration committee  The immigrants of the same age?

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz

Citizenship and Immigration committee  All other immigrants?

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Well, you might say the appropriate comparison would be people in the same demographic category. I think that's not a proper economic model. The census of Canada is very clear to identify families as economic units. They call it “economic family”. The census data are collected in

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I'll pass. I don't have a view on that question. Thank you.

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz

Citizenship and Immigration committee  That is a very interesting question, and we don't have a lot of evidence I can cite in research showing that people are attracted to one country as opposed to another because of more liberal family-class admission criteria, but the point was made earlier that, when family members

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz

Citizenship and Immigration committee  It's my view that the legislation requires Parliament to set the total numbers of immigrants, and within that numbers are allocated across the various categories, and they all can be seen as, in effect, quotas. It seems to me setting the numbers is part of the responsibility of

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I think to have people under a family class without any kind of limit at all, that would be contrary to the legislation.

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Yes. I certainly agree with all the comments that have been made by the other two presenters, but I want to emphasize that while we may call the family class a humanitarian class, that is a term we're using, it seems to imply less of an economic contribution from the family class

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz

Citizenship and Immigration committee  I guess one of the points I would make there is that as we've seen the immigration numbers change over the years, there has been a definite attempt to increase the proportion of immigrants selected on the basis of economic criteria and reduce the family-class component. I think t

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Sure, this is my last sentence: the family class is an important part of the economic goal of the immigration program. Thank you.

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Thank you for the invitation to appear here, and for the opportunity to present some views. My comments are not about any of the specific questions about the features of family-class immigration, but about the place of family-class immigration in the overall immigration program.

October 25th, 2016Committee meeting

Prof. Jeffrey Reitz