Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-5 of 5

Public Safety committee  Even if there is a fault provision, it's very difficult to be able to judge people's intentions. It's also difficult to be able to safeguard who is judging those intentions and whether or not those powers won't still be abused.

October 20th, 2016Committee meeting

Timothy McSorley

Public Safety committee  I would say that there are times when that happens. I wouldn't say that it's necessarily a reason to have tougher provisions against those actions. From my experience often when it crosses those lines, it could be that it's provoked because of actions by security agencies that pu

October 20th, 2016Committee meeting

Timothy McSorley

Public Safety committee  In a way, but I'd also say that I think, as others have pointed out too, that there are provisions in the Criminal Code that do stop people and that can be used against people who damage property and commit other infractions. I think that the extra aspect of adding terrorism char

October 20th, 2016Committee meeting

Timothy McSorley

Public Safety committee  Excellent. Thank you.

October 20th, 2016Committee meeting

Timothy McSorley

Public Safety committee  [Technical difficulty—Editor] that relates specifically to issues of free expression, dissent, and political activity in Canada that touches mostly on Bill C-51 but on some other aspects regarding Canada's national security laws as well. We're very concerned that the broad defin

October 20th, 2016Committee meeting

Timothy McSorley