Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-11 of 11
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  I don't think the U.S. tariffs have anything to do with Canada imposing measures on other countries. While there have been reports that the U.S. was concerned about transshipment, we never had discussions with the United States about specific concerns of theirs with transshipment

June 11th, 2019Committee meeting

John Layton

Finance committee  I don't think so. At the beginning, he mentioned the link to NAFTA. At first we thought that. We did explore the issue of whether there was something we could do on transshipment, but we never discovered what the problem was with transshipment.

June 11th, 2019Committee meeting

John Layton

Finance committee  On your first question, I think the United States would be interested in seeing what Canada is doing to address offshore steel imports. They have the same concerns as ours with the global overcapacity and market distortions, so I think they would notice what we do. I think they'v

June 11th, 2019Committee meeting

John Layton

Finance committee  I think the legislation is consistent with our legal obligations in the sense that there's no obligation to have this time period or moratorium on new measures. There's no obligation to have that in our law. However, if Canada imposed another measure within the two-year period, b

June 11th, 2019Committee meeting

John Layton

Finance committee  I think we will face questions about why we're doing it, but my understanding is that there wouldn't be a WTO dispute launched because of our law.

June 11th, 2019Committee meeting

John Layton

International Trade committee  We meet frequently with our North American partners in Mexico and the United States, with government officials and with their industries as well. Twice a year, we have the North American steel trade committee that meets to discuss issues of common interest. Usually, those involve

November 3rd, 2016Committee meeting

John Layton

International Trade committee  I think that we have to continue to advocate that we have an integrated economy with the United States and integrated supply chains and that it's to their detriment economically to have these policies. That's part of our advocate strategy in the United States, to continually educ

November 3rd, 2016Committee meeting

John Layton

International Trade committee  Sometimes. It's a challenge, but we keep sending the message.

November 3rd, 2016Committee meeting

John Layton

International Trade committee  For your first question about China, I can't really speak to the climate change implications. That's an important issue. Certainly, developing countries say that it should be developed countries that take the burden of addressing emissions. There are multilateral agreements on cl

November 3rd, 2016Committee meeting

John Layton

International Trade committee  The issue about trade-intensive industries and the impact of carbon-intensive imports is something that's part of the emissions discussions domestically. In terms of what Global Affairs Canada is doing, certainly on the steel file, we recognize that China has 400 million tonnes

November 3rd, 2016Committee meeting

John Layton

International Trade committee  I would just add that, as Paul said, they have an exemption that allows them to have Buy American policies, but the Canadian representatives in Washington and our counsel are quite active in advocating for exemptions for Canada or certainly trying to stop the U.S. from expanding

November 3rd, 2016Committee meeting

John Layton