Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 151-165 of 176
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  Earlier, with Mr. Dubé, we touched on paragraph 8b). This paragraph is a restriction; how often will it be applied? We have to consider this. Based on what a minister said recently, this prerogative will be used very rarely. I have a note in English that explains my thinking. I

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

Public Safety committee  We have to understand—and I believe you understand this too—that there is a difference between review, which is part of the mandate, and access to the information referred to in clause 13 and in the following clauses. I would say it is not exactly the same thing.

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

Public Safety committee  Are you referring to committees of experts?

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

Public Safety committee  I don't see it that way. I do not think it is a question of taking precedence. I see what you are getting at, but each committee or body has its own mandate. I don't think it is a question of precedence. I do not see it that way at all. The expert review mandate that we have, as

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

Public Safety committee  That might be useful. I do not see a problem in calling witnesses to appear if you wish. For example, if you are conducting a review of a specific department and want access to documents and witnesses, but are being refused, it could be problematic if you do not have a power of

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

Public Safety committee  It that clause 14 or clause 15?

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

Public Safety committee  I don't see why they would do that unless they are in bad faith, and I assume that everybody is acting in good faith unless the contrary is proven to me.

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

Public Safety committee  Are you talking about a quorum?

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

Public Safety committee  Clause 17, is it? I notice there is no provision in the bill about a quorum in this committee. It says there are nine members, and clauses 18 and 19, for example, talk about voting, but they don't talk about a quorum. I think there should be a provision saying that the quorum for

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

Public Safety committee  Part of my mandate is to ensure that CSE activities comply with the law. It goes without saying therefore that if they do not comply, I have to inform the Minister of National Defence, who is responsible for the CSE, as well as the Attorney General of Canada, in accordance with t

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

Public Safety committee  It is the Security Intelligence Review Committee, or SIRC.

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe

Public Safety committee  First of all, you have to understand the nature of the committee that the bill would create. It is a committee of parliamentarians, but not a committee of Parliament, it is a creature of the executive. I don't think this is the first time you have heard this. This is why the prim

November 15th, 2016Committee meeting

Jean-Pierre Plouffe