Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-13 of 13
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Fisheries committee  I would like to agree with that last statement. I think one reason we've had a Fisheries Act that has not maintained a sustainable fishery is ministerial discretion, which sometimes has had terrible consequences. I've seen environmental impact statements where the proponent's own

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  I would think the obvious answer to that is that this is what regulations are for. Regulations are commonly tailored to individual fisheries and areas. I don't see a problem with one overreaching act, if the regulations are tailored to the problems of specific regions, as the wit

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  That's what the math would say. They're proposing 100,000 to 130,000 megawatts of additional power generation between now and 2050. That would be three to four large dams per year. I don't think it can happen. My recommendation would be that this plan needs to be revisited.

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  I don't have any direct experience with that. I expect it was probably the same thing that we experienced at all fishery stations. Problems were multiplying, and the number of staff expected to handle them was going down.

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  Yes, I think the separation of the two under the fisheries research board, which did science to best support Canadian fisheries and was entirely governed by a board of senior fisheries and freshwater and oceanographic scientists, produced very good science. That was then handed o

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  It's pretty clear that they reduced the protections for fish habitat.

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  I don't think, however, to date, you would expect to see any effect. One of the reasons was mentioned earlier. If you don't have people in the field to observe, you're not going to see any effect by definition. Number two is that only a few years have gone by. Most large project

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  My mind is that the science should be done with strictly scientific oversight and the science passed on to the minister, so that it's crystal clear where and why the decisions are made. Certainly, the elected minister should have the final oversight, but the taxpayer should be su

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  I would say that if a man-made habitat proves to be equal to the natural habitat, and in my experience it's often permitted by at least the old Fisheries Act as a replacement for habitat that cannot be otherwise restored, such as in the dewatering of lakes, then it should be perm

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  It would be better if this were all done under one agency.

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  I think it's fair to say that a strengthened science department could also be given the responsibility for monitoring Canada's fisheries which, frankly, are a mess right now, as recent experience on the Athabasca River shows clearly. Monitoring now is done by a hodgepodge of cons

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the House committee. It is a pleasure to appear before you today. My experience with fisheries in Canada has spanned almost 50 years, roughly half as a university professor and the other half as a member of the Department of Fisheries and O

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler

Fisheries committee  Can you hear me now?

December 7th, 2016Committee meeting

Dr. David Schindler