Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-51 of 51
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Transport committee  That is an excellent question.

December 1st, 2016Committee meeting

David Schwartz

Transport committee  I will have to check that again with legal services, because I am not a lawyer. In my view, the purpose of the bill is to gather information.

December 1st, 2016Committee meeting

David Schwartz

Transport committee  I would say, absolutely, yes. At this time, if our requirements are to build a new bridge or to do some maintenance on a building, we will have technical specifications, we'll have requirements, a statement of work, effectively. The other benefits that accrue, such as community

December 1st, 2016Committee meeting

David Schwartz

Transport committee  Good morning, everyone. Madam Chair and members of the committee, hello. I would like to thank you for giving me the opportunity to answer your questions concerning Bill C-227. My name is David Schwartz, as the chair mentioned, and I am the director general of CAAMS, the commer

December 1st, 2016Committee meeting

David Schwartz

Transport committee  I would like to clarify that. In fact, our sector purchases various kinds of vehicles, parts, construction materials, and so on. The construction and maintenance of federal government buildings represents about $5.4 billion of the $7.8 billion annually. In addition, 72 per cent

December 1st, 2016Committee meeting

David Schwartz

Transport committee  I would like to clarify something. I said 98 per cent for Quebec and Ontario. That figure is different; it is a base figure. To arrive at that figure, I considered all construction contracts signed by Public Services and Procurement Canada. On average, that comes to a little over

December 1st, 2016Committee meeting

David Schwartz