Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Agriculture committee Thank you very much for the question and the opportunity to respond. I think first and foremost we would like to see the PMRA consider more of the data that is available than what is currently in their decision. There is a wealth of data out there that wasn't part of this decisi
March 7th, 2017Committee meeting
Paul Thiel
Agriculture committee Yes, absolutely.
March 7th, 2017Committee meeting
Paul Thiel
Agriculture committee Our experience has been that when the government was going to make a regulatory proposal, we had the opportunity to discuss that with them. In this case, the discussion did not take place prior to publication of the proposal.
March 7th, 2017Committee meeting
Paul Thiel
Agriculture committee I believe the label as it stands today is fit for use. It provides adequate direction to growers. When used according to the label direction, it poses no undue risk.
March 7th, 2017Committee meeting
Paul Thiel
Agriculture committee I think what you described are pieces of the puzzle that describe the story. We work through a series of tiered risk assessments, starting with the very most fundamental, controlled, in-lab types of studies, which give us direction as to what we should look for at the next level.
March 7th, 2017Committee meeting
Paul Thiel
Agriculture committee Madam Chair, members of committee, thank you for inviting me here today to share with you Bayer's view on the proposed regulatory action on imidacloprid with respect to aquatic invertebrate safety and its potential impact on segments of production agriculture in Canada. Bayer is
March 7th, 2017Committee meeting
Paul Thiel