Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-60 of 60
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

Veterans Affairs committee  It would not be the WSIB of Ontario.

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  Well, it's not within our drug formulary. It is our medical opinion and our legal opinion that there's no proof that it is effective in the treatment of our injuries. That's our stand right now.

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  Is this for post-traumatic stress in particular?

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  In the whole compensation system?

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  We do connect regularly. We have an association of compensation boards across Canada. Yes, we would have that.

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  Someone would, yes. I'm sure I could find it or get someone to do it. Yes.

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  You know, I'm not overly familiar with that part of our large organization.

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  I do know that there's a certain amount of rigour around anything we do with respect to our drug formulary and what's accepted or not. We look at research, and I know that there's a department that specifically drills into it. On medical marijuana, I've seen some discussion arou

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  Right, of course. They would follow a treatment plan, but we won't necessarily pay for the drug.

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  Okay. I'm not overly familiar with that. I know that it's a nuance for this type of injury and—

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  —it's not the norm, but since this legislation came to us in 2016, it was recognized in this program that many of the clients who wanted to apply didn't meet the standard of having that diagnosis. They couldn't. They had been treated by their family physician for a year and the m

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  They would be considered civilian, I believe, and that's why they gain entrance to our legislation. We do have claims. I've dealt with some myself.

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise

Veterans Affairs committee  We would treat the employer as we would treat anyone else. There's an agreement that wherever the worker is injured, the laws of that province, regardless of whether or not the employer is federal, would take precedence. We require the same thing from the accident employer, the f

May 3rd, 2017Committee meeting

John Genise