Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Finance committee Sorry. Could you repeat the question, sir?
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee Let me just clarify. It's an amendment to the RCMP Act. There is a clause in the RCMP Act that makes an explicit reference back to the Parliament of Canada Act, and the numbers in the Parliament of Canada Act have changed, so it's just to make the link-up between the RCMP Act and
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee It's a housekeeping amendment.
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee The minister's deputy has consent, yes. Paragraph (b) that is currently in the legislation will be the only provision there, and that will only be for the election costing part.
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee It will strike (a) and (c). It will keep (b) for during the election costing and continue to require the deputy approval before things are disclosed, but for (a) and (c) those would be removed. Once the PBO is provided with the information, it will be at the PBO's discretion in t
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee The next business day the PBO may make it public, but there has to be a grace period of one business day.
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee Do you mean for the other agents...other officers of the Library of Parliament and the COI Act?
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee It's my understanding that the officers would provide it to the Speakers for their consideration and approval, and then it would be submitted. It would be submitted to Treasury Board, which would not approve it but would act as a sort of conduit with the estimates, as opposed to
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee Certainly I think the expectation now is that, say, the Library of Parliament, would submit its estimates to the Speakers to be approved and then sent off. This would remove that approval function and basically it would be sent to them either as a mailbox or for a discussion, but
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee As a Governor in Council appointee, yes, he would be a public office holder for the purpose of the Conflict of Interest Act, although he's not a reporting public office holder currently.
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee Yes.
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee That is my understanding. Certainly he could not be employed doing anything that could be conceived as a conflict. I would have to check the Conflict of Interest Act to definitively say that it completely bars external employment, but I'm fairly certain it does.
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee The PBO? Yes. The order in council that would appoint the individual would have the salary range associated with it.
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee Yes, that is my understanding.
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth
Finance committee The GIC, the system...?
May 29th, 2017Committee meeting
Don Booth