Official Languages committee  Give me two seconds to answer you. “[A]ny substantive change ...”; we aren't talking about any amendment whatsoever.

Official Languages committee  Yes, “those ... requirements”; it relates to sections 4, 5 and 6. Adding something to sections 4, 5 and 6, would be amending them.

Official Languages committee  We agree.

Official Languages committee  It's possible. I don't think it's as solid, as arguments go.

Official Languages committee  Because it's a political statement, which isn't necessarily subject to control by the courts. It's a matter of justiciability.

Official Languages committee  Yes.

Official Languages committee  The short answer is yes.

Official Languages committee  That's right.

Official Languages committee  That's a sensitive issue. The fact that there's a disagreement between these two constitutional experts—which I respect very much—and I suggest that a challenge would inevitably be brought before the courts, because it is not an issue that has been decided. I must admit that I

Official Languages committee  It's a paragraph from the court's opinion.

Official Languages committee  Yes.

Official Languages committee  No, not in the same paragraph.

Official Languages committee  No. Let's agree on that.

Official Languages committee  Listen, if you don't want—

Official Languages committee  The Court says—you have the paragraph in front of you—