Environment committee  We'll be doing analysis based on the full country, so I don't have that information at the moment. We've been focused on implementing our benchmark and our backstop approach, and the analysis will be forthcoming when we have greater clarity on the rest of the provinces.

Environment committee  I don't have that information.

Environment committee  Sorry, I'm not always so—

Environment committee  I'm sorry. I'll continue en anglais. Thank you. Because the backstop model is really meant to fill gaps where trading systems or other pricing systems don't exist, our hope is that individual jurisdictions will implement systems that are consistent with this backstop approach. U

Environment committee  Thank you for your question. On carbon pricing, as you pointed out, there are a number of different jurisdictions, with different regimes and different price levels. There is a carbon tax in B.C. There's a bit of a hybrid system in Alberta, and cap and trade is being pursued in

Environment committee  Both Ontario and Quebec have signed on to the pan-Canadian framework, including the carbon pricing component, which includes the benchmark that was released well in advance of the pan-Canadian framework. The proposed price increases within the Quebec and Ontario systems were rele

Environment committee  I'm not aware of any forward projections of the potential revenues. I think we're waiting to see which provinces pursue which types of systems in the interim. There are a lot of decisions. What we're proposing is a backstop approach, so it's meant to apply only where—