Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 59
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Accounts committee  In terms of review, we know where we were missing the proper process to make the information on the Canadian register fully accurate. We know about that. Right now we're correcting the situation. The full correction of all the linkages is not done but the review has been complete

May 2nd, 2019Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Public Accounts committee  The federal heritage buildings review office is managed out of Parks Canada. It's targeted to look at federal properties. Everything that is federally owned comes, after an age threshold of 40 years, to FHBRO for an assessment, an evaluation of the heritage character of the prope

May 2nd, 2019Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Public Accounts committee  No, that's not for the federal heritage building category. You may have a building that is owned by a private individual that could go through a process of being designated but under another process, which is national historic site designation. That is another process under the H

May 2nd, 2019Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Public Accounts committee  The owner is responsible.

May 2nd, 2019Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Public Accounts committee  It's an honorific designation, so there's no way to intervene with the exception that, if they come for funding to the cost-sharing program we are running and ask for money, then we will make sure that the intervention is according to the standards.

May 2nd, 2019Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Environment committee  The people we work with are listening. The ones that come to us are working...and I hope they're all coming.

October 19th, 2017Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Environment committee  We don't have statistics, but we've seen all the main projects, for sure.

October 19th, 2017Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Environment committee  I wouldn't say they are at odds. They're both considered when we're making decisions. In terms of reporting, we're asked to report on anything that we're doing on the ecological front, whereas with the commemorative integrity is something that we do because we want to do it. Ther

October 19th, 2017Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Environment committee  I cannot answer this question. I really don't have an answer.

October 19th, 2017Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Environment committee  Thank you. Legislation is stronger than policy. That's just a fact.

October 19th, 2017Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Environment committee  Could you repeat the question, please? Sorry about that.

October 19th, 2017Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Environment committee  Workable is one thing. The feasibility of the recommendations is a different aspect that may deserve some thinking. There are medium- to short-term and medium- to long-term advantages to some of the proposals that were made. Depending on where this committee wants to go, there ar

October 19th, 2017Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Environment committee  I cannot fully answer your question. I can tell you, however, that the two departments do cooperate. Ms. Joly plays an active role with respect to museums. Some of those museums are also heritage buildings, so responsibility for buildings can overlap. I would say that cooperatio

October 19th, 2017Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Environment committee  I will consider that question as being intended for me, since I represent the Parks Canada Agency.

October 19th, 2017Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois

Environment committee  It is true that the Parks Canada Agency is responsible for built heritage, under the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change, Ms. McKenna. I think built heritage is in the right place, and for good reasons, historically speaking. On the other hand, a minister's responsibi

October 19th, 2017Committee meeting

Genevieve Charrois