Government Operations committee  We don't have those explicit numbers split out, unfortunately. It's potentially something we could go back and do. I would equate it roughly to what the one-year and two-year delay costs would be, because that's roughly what the delays were. As for the lightship weight increase

Government Operations committee  We effectively did take the specifications as given and provided by the Department of National Defence. We are not capability experts, but of course, we do need to factor into the account that there are differences in capabilities that could explain the differences in cost.

Finance committee  I think what you're referring to is our costing exercise. We looked at the equal parenting employment insurance measure. In general—just to walk you through it—in preparation for the electoral platform costing where we will have to cost various requests from political parties, we

Finance committee  In the report, we basically saw that we could have overall savings of $4.2 billion, but again, this whole estimation was based on a very specific formulary provided to us by the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, and that was only looking at the drugs on Quebec's publ

Finance committee  That is correct, with one caveat, and that is the cost to Canadians using this specific pharmacare plan, so again, the drugs that are on Quebec's public formulary and assuming that we could as a nation achieve these savings on those medications.

Finance committee  I will answer your second question first. It isn't something we included in the report. To answer your first question about whether or not we looked at small businesses, no, we didn't. It's partly that it would be difficult with the specific data we requested. We didn't really tr