Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Transport committee There's a call open now, I believe. It closes in the middle of March.
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee I can take that question, if you like. Compliance agreements are a mechanism that exists in other Canadian legislation. They offer the possibility of someone who's violated the requirements of the legislation to acknowledge that there has been a violation and commit to addressi
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee —a $250,000 limit.
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee Thank you for the question. I think it's fair to say that we're early on in the plans with respect to that. There are a number of issues that we're trying to work through. When it comes to pleasure craft, for example, we have been looking at the model of Washington State. For
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee It would be the consent of whoever is responsible for that location. It might be the owner or the operator of the marina, whatever it is—
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee —the municipality—
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee Potentially it could be, exactly. It's whoever is responsible for that location.
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee There are legitimate situations in which someone might need to leave a vessel somewhere. It was felt that 30 days, for example, was too short in the case of those emergency situations; therefore, we went with the 60 days. Do you want to add to that?
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee Yes, and it's important to note that you can't just move it 100 feet farther down the water. There's the three-nautical-mile requirement as well.
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee They would have to be willing to pay to move the vessel outside the three nautical miles every 60 days. That seems to be a significant investment. The feeling was that someone who was not willing to act on their vessel responsibly is not likely to be making that type of investmen
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee The penalty is assessed once they have not taken the action. It's not punitive; it is compensatory—well, I don't know if I would use the word “compensatory”, but it is intended to be a deterrent. It should generally cost less or at least be comparable to the cost for them to actu
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee I don't know if you can speak to an individual pleasure craft with a $3-million price tag—
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee It's more likely to be a corporation, which has—
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee We're going back many years, with the most active consideration being in the last couple of years. We had to look at roles and responsibilities across the country. This is not a federal-only challenge; this is a challenge for provinces, territories, and municipalities. We had to
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack
Transport committee Madam Chair, do you mind if I go back on one small point related to Ms. Malcolmson's earlier question? I wanted to mention that the legislation gives us the capacity for making regulations. It gives us the power to impose conditions on the sale of vessels. That is an area where,
February 5th, 2018Committee meeting
Ellen Burack