Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-7 of 7
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Finance committee  That's right. Currently the government has been relying on a provision under the Financial Administration Act, which allows the government to repay over-collected funds through remission orders. It is a repetitive process. It's inefficient. We have to do it every so often when w

November 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Lorraine McKenzie Presley

Finance committee  No, it doesn't.

November 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Lorraine McKenzie Presley

Finance committee  Yes, it's completely different.

November 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Lorraine McKenzie Presley

Finance committee  That's a very good question. We looked at a number of different options, including the regulatory option. The way it works is that the Northern Pipeline Agency has one proponent, and the NEB does not, so it's a different scenario there. With dramatic fluctuations in the way that

November 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Lorraine McKenzie Presley

Finance committee  Thank you very much. Good evening, everyone. What I'd like to do tonight is to quickly describe the issue and our proposed solution. Then we can respond to any questions you may have. First, the Northern Pipeline Agency is a federal agency within the Department of Natural Resou

November 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Lorraine McKenzie Presley

Finance committee  As of March 31, 2017, it's $4.8 million.

November 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Lorraine McKenzie Presley

Finance committee  It's accumulated.

November 6th, 2017Committee meeting

Lorraine McKenzie Presley