Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Transport committee I think that it has been largely left to the water utility, and by and large they've done a good job. In response to direct regulation, obviously if there is a law, they are mandated to meet it. Some of our standards here in the United States are more about common sense or are vo
November 23rd, 2017Committee meeting
Dr. Marc Edwards
Transport committee It's really a combination. They changed their water source, which changed their chemistry, which changed the propensity to leach lead into the water. If they had done that and not had the lead pipes, obviously there would not have been a problem, but because they had that change
November 23rd, 2017Committee meeting
Dr. Marc Edwards
Transport committee I think that communal waters systems are a very good idea, but we have to deal with the reality that our water sources are changing. For example, as aquifers are drawn down, in the United States we've had to switch to surface water. As in the case of Flint, Michigan, that change
November 23rd, 2017Committee meeting
Dr. Marc Edwards
Transport committee In terms of the inventory in the United States, some utilities have very good records, in which case they are in good shape. The vast majority of the utilities, however, have extremely poor records, so we're left with going into the basements of consumers' homes to see what pipe
November 23rd, 2017Committee meeting
Dr. Marc Edwards
Transport committee Thank you for having me. In the U.S. we're currently in the midst of a paradigm shift in how we're thinking about our water infrastructure. There are three main reasons for that. First, we're trying to deal with the legacy of these lead pipes. If you ever read a book called The
November 23rd, 2017Committee meeting
Dr. Marc Edwards