Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 121-125 of 125
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The answer is that the technology would be there, should the House decide to use it.

November 20th, 2018Committee meeting

Michel Patrice

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Not from a House of Commons perspective, as the Speaker has mentioned. It would be more deferred costs as opposed to the expenditure. It would not occur related to the move, it would happen a bit later.

April 24th, 2018Committee meeting

Michel Patrice

Procedure and House Affairs committee  In relation to the House of Commons resource requirements, it is the intention, other than the carry-forward that comes as a matter of course, not to come for supplementary estimates. We feel that the budget that's been approved by the board will be sufficient for us to carry for

April 24th, 2018Committee meeting

Michel Patrice

Procedure and House Affairs committee  This program was put in place in partnership with the PPS, and also PSPC. It's in relation to the renovation of the buildings and the need to repair things in the facilities in the buildings. It is done under the responsibility of PSPC. A third party firm was hired, essentially

April 24th, 2018Committee meeting

Michel Patrice

Procedure and House Affairs committee  That's right. The contractors will maintain the same program we had before. PPS members will escort the contractors into an MP's office and remain there while the repair is being done.

April 24th, 2018Committee meeting

Michel Patrice