Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 139
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I think that can be improved upon and is workable. If you have, for example, a period of one hour on a Tuesday every week when you take these votes, you can assign windows of time, so that during these five minutes of that hour, X, Y and Z members can send their votes in. That's

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  That is absolutely a concern, and that's why multiple layers of validation are important.

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  That is correct. However, keep in mind the aspect of a necessary second or third band of confirmation, which is not involved with the video system. This could be added as a way to validate it or make it good enough. You have to have that other validation.

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It does tend to help; however, the degradation in people's belief in the system being accurate, the very existence of the possibility that somebody could, even temporarily, be recorded in the wrong way tends to harm that system overall—

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  —and people's understanding that there are multiple layers of confirmation that always exist is a good thing.

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I would say the worst thing that could happen is that somebody's individual device is compromised and the audio is being manipulated to make it sound like they said “no” when they meant to say or did say “yes”.

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Absolutely. It just has to be done correctly.

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Could you summarize it?

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I would not be talking about anything secret on this type of communication, because it's a public, open knowledge type of forum. It's probably okay, but I would not translate anything that needs to be kept confidential over this platform or any other commercial generic offering o

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  The plan I would have in place, and if you do not, you need to get it in place, is one to immediately mitigate the compromise. Don't necessarily turn everything off, because you can lose valuable forensics that way, but segment and mitigate it. Have defined roles ahead of time so

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Absolutely. In order to have that happen, the proxy person, or whoever, would have to physically be in the residence in order to have the IP address that it is sent from and known ahead of time to be received from. That validates, at least from a physical perspective, that where

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  I would summarize it as a second band of confirmation, some sort of non-connected secondary confirmation method that is out of the original network.

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  It may work. But over time, it will head south as far as integrity and belief in the system go. It will only degrade.

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery

Procedure and House Affairs committee  Absolutely. I steadfastly believe there is an undeclared world war, practically occurring as we speak, against democracy and everything that it stands for. So yes, there are lots of people, both for profit and for political ideology purposes, around the world actively, 24 hours a

June 11th, 2020Committee meeting

Chris Vickery