Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-9 of 9
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Procedure and House Affairs committee  That would have been in 2004.

June 5th, 2018Committee meeting

Barbara Bucknell

Transport committee  Sure. We also have draft guidance on a provision under our law around “appropriate purposes”. It's kind of an overarching principle that an organization may collect, use, and disclose personal information for appropriate purposes.

May 9th, 2018Committee meeting

Barbara Bucknell

May 9th, 2018Committee meeting

Barbara Bucknell

Transport committee  It's going to be finalized at the same time as the consent guidance.

May 9th, 2018Committee meeting

Barbara Bucknell

Transport committee  It does the inverse I think of what you're saying, though. It says that these are the kinds of uses that we think are or should be considered no-go zones.

May 9th, 2018Committee meeting

Barbara Bucknell

May 9th, 2018Committee meeting

Barbara Bucknell

Information & Ethics committee  That's correct. The amount is $100,000, but it is not the OPC that issues the fine. It's a penalty, and we would have to refer it to the Attorney General.

May 1st, 2018Committee meeting

Barbara Bucknell

Information & Ethics committee  I've heard that as well. I think we'll have to get back to you with some more specifics on that.

May 1st, 2018Committee meeting

Barbara Bucknell

May 1st, 2018Committee meeting

Barbara Bucknell