Fisheries committee  We are on amendment PV-13. If PV-13 is adopted, NDP-24 becomes moot, as they are identical. Also, if PV-13 is defeated, so is NDP-24, as they are identical. Ms. May.

Fisheries committee  Mr. Hardie.

Fisheries committee  Mr. Donnelly.

Fisheries committee  Therefore, NDP-24 is stricken. (Clause 30 as amended agreed to on division) (On clause 31) We have amendment PV-14. Ms. May.

Fisheries committee  We're on NDP-25. If NDP-25 is adopted, PV-15 becomes moot, as they are identical. Also, if NDP-25 is defeated, so is PV-15, as they are identical. Mr. Donnelly, on NDP-25, please.

Fisheries committee  Ms. May.

Fisheries committee  Mr. Morrissey.

Fisheries committee  It would then say “That Bill C-68 be amended, on page 33, line 31, by replacing the words 'him or her' by 'the Minister'”. That's (a). For (b), “on page 33, line 32, by replacing the words 'him or her' by 'the Minister'.” Is there any further discussion on those amendments? (Ame

Fisheries committee  We are on amendment NDP-21. Mr. Donnelly.

Fisheries committee  On NDP-22, go ahead, Mr. Donnelly

Fisheries committee  It's the language of the bill.

Fisheries committee  Does the government have an amendment to make the language gender neutral to “Minister”? Mr. Hardie.

Fisheries committee  We will suspend for two minutes.

Fisheries committee  You're not moving it? Okay, it shall not be moved. (Clause 29 agreed to on division) (On clause 30) We have NDP-18.

Fisheries committee  We are on PV-12. If PV-12 is adopted, NDP-20 and CPC-18 cannot be moved as there is a line conflict, and NDP-23 becomes moot as its provisions would already be adopted. Ms. May.