Human Resources committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. The bill relates to the health services. My understanding, from just reading the amendment, is that it talks about critical infrastructure workers. As I said, the bill talks about health services. This amendment adds a new concept and it's not related to t

Human Resources committee  Mr. Chair, do you want me to read clause 2?

Human Resources committee  Clause 2 of the Bill C-3 reads as follows: The Act is amended by adding the following after section 423.1: Intimidation — health services 423.2(1) Every person commits an offence who engages in any conduct with the intent to provoke a state of fear in (a) a person in o

Agriculture committee  Mr. Chair, clause 2 was not amended. There was no amendment.

Agriculture committee  Yes. If everyone agrees, there is no problem.

Agriculture committee  Yes.

Agriculture committee  Mr. Chair, since there were a couple of amendments adopted, you have to ask the last question concerning the reprint of the bill. Can you see it? It may be on the other side of the page.

Agriculture committee  Just to clarify, do you want to remove the “will or” and add “could reasonably”, or do you want to keep “will or could reasonably”?

Agriculture committee  Yes. You just need the unanimous consent to withdraw the subamendment. The “will or” will be withdrawn if everybody agrees with that.

Agriculture committee  Okay.

Agriculture committee  We will replace it with “could reasonably result in the exposure”.

Agriculture committee  Correct.

Agriculture committee  This is a new subamendment. You can have a debate, and whenever you want you can vote on this subamendment by Ms. Rood.

Agriculture committee  Mr. Chair—

Agriculture committee  I want maybe a confirmation from Mr. MacGregor. Did you formally move the subamendment changing the word “could” by “would” or “should”? I just want this clarification.