Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Finance committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. I had started discussing artificial losses using equity-based financial instruments. This measure relates to tightening up and improving upon gaps or uncertainties in the currently existing synthetic equity arrangement and security lending agreement rule
November 1st, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee Thank you for the comment. The next measure is found in clauses 10 and 16 of the bill. It's a similar measure dealing with stop-loss rules on share repurchase transactions, and again it prevents financial institutions from generating artificial losses in off-market securities tr
November 1st, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee The next measure relates to artificial losses using equity-based financial instruments. These amendments tighten up and improve upon gaps or weaknesses in the currently existing rules that prevent the creation of artificial losses by primarily financial institutions on certain eq
November 1st, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. I was going to go through each of the measures in the bill briefly, in the order in which they appear. If it would be helpful to committee members, I could also provide the relevant clause numbering for each of the measures. I understand this is a prestudy
November 1st, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee Of course, I would be happy to. For the first measure, the divisive reorganizations, it is clauses 2 and 39. For the second measure, the cross-border surplus stripping involving partnerships and trusts, that is clauses 3 to 5, as well as 14 and 21.
November 1st, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee I'll combine the next two sets of measures. They deal with foreign affiliate rules. There's a set of currently existing rules in the Income Tax Act that prevents the shifting of income on passive property offshore to a controlled foreign affiliate of a taxpayer. If you have that
November 1st, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee In general terms, if there's a policy decision that's taken by a government, it can get complex, I think, but it's always possible to draft your way there. In this case, the government decided to maintain the tax on split income level at 33% to maintain the disincentive to splitt
May 22nd, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee Mr. Chair, I'd be happy to go through the proposed amendment from a technical perspective. The charging provision for the tax on split income is in subsection 120.4(2). As was noted, it currently applies the tax on split income at the highest marginal rate. That's defined in su
May 22nd, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee Setting aside a subjective and normative evaluation of what's fair, what it would do is ensure that to the extent you're able to split income, you'll be taxed at the lowest personal income tax rate. To give you a different example, let's say two married lawyers were each earning
May 22nd, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee I'm sorry. Under this proposed amendment—
May 22nd, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee I believe that one of the conditions for the application of subsection 160(4), which is the provision referenced in the proposal in the excluded amount definition, has the requirement that the couple be living separate and apart at the end of the year in order to qualify.
May 22nd, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee Thank you, Mr. Chair. The proposals in clause 13 of the bill operate within the general scheme of the act relating to property transfers on the dissolution of a marriage, the breakdown of a marriage. In particular, there is already a provision in the “excluded amount” definitio
May 22nd, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee Perhaps I can build on Maude's comments. First of all, I don't know that one of the goals was to prevent the proliferation of corporations so much as it was to ensure that when corporations are used, the appropriate tax results occur. You mentioned as well the use of an asset th
April 24th, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee I'm sorry. I think we're here to explain the technical tax changes in parts 1 and 2 and other parts of the bill. I think that falls outside of the area of our expertise.
April 24th, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan
Finance committee It has more to do with provinces that require the amount determined in paragraph 122.61(c) of the Income Tax Act. If they refer to needing that information specifically, then with the change in the rules, (c) wouldn't have been there anymore. It was kept on the books for a couple
April 24th, 2018Committee meeting
Trevor McGowan