Fisheries committee  We provided specific wording for proposed section 2.1. We added proposed paragraph 2.1(d), and this wording is also consistent with the wording we've provided for Bill C-69, so that the two acts are consistent with including UNDRIP.

Fisheries committee  Yes, we have included specific proposed amendments to several clauses. To the purposes section of the act, we have several suggested changes to the new section 2.1, one of which is reconciliation with indigenous peoples, including “respect for the existing rights of the Indigenou

Fisheries committee  That's in our written submission.

Fisheries committee  We have included specific wording for proposed section 2.5, that climate change impacts be included as a ministerial decision-making consideration. Our written brief seeks a commitment from the Government of Canada to incorporate that, which might actually require some consultati

Fisheries committee  Absolutely. We've been trying to address that at a local level for a number of years now as well. We didn't include that in our written submission just as a matter of space and time, but that's absolutely something we support.

Fisheries committee  Yes. In alignment with the B.C. first nations fisheries coalition's submission, they submitted in their brief a call for further consultation with indigenous groups to define indigenous fisheries. That relates to the need for further consultation. It also relates to our submiss

Fisheries committee  Yes, we would absolutely agree with that. We included restoration and reconciliation as our top priorities for the act, but we have included in our written brief recommendations for strengthening the rebuilding of stocks. From Tsleil-Waututh's perspective, restoration would inclu