Natural Resources committee  I think that's a fair point. Frankly, we also do forecasts out to 2050, and I'm sure we're going to be wrong, just like everybody else. I gave us as one example, but our competitors are in the same situation. There are research firms that are trying to think about this in the lon

Natural Resources committee  That's a good question. I'm somewhat ambivalent about the idea of the government doing its own long-term projections about what the energy sector will look like. You're exactly right that the good forecasts, EIA's included, provide high, low, and middle scenarios. I think that'

Natural Resources committee  [Inaudible—Editor] the folks at the EIA directly as well. We know them well here in D.C. We actually provide some of our data to them, and of course we consume a lot of their data. The EIA is literally in the U.S. Department of Energy building, but it is essentially its own inde

Natural Resources committee  The EIA collect the data, and then they in turn do some analysis themselves.

Natural Resources committee  I would say they do their own analysis of the data on a current basis, which I think is outstanding. The only time I would ever really take major issue with the EIA is when they do long-term forecasting, because that actually goes beyond the realm of data collection and into the

Natural Resources committee  Thank you for the question. Historically, my team has gone down and looked at provincial-level data disclosure. Some of the stuff at the provincial level is pretty good. In some provinces, it's good and in some provinces it's not as good. The format in which the data is produced

Natural Resources committee  Thank you very much for the opportunity. If at any time you can't hear me, just let me know. I'm happy to join you here from Washington, where we're hoping by the end of the day we will hoist our first ever Stanley Cup. Not to rub it in, but we've very excited to be in the fi