Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 19
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Canadian Heritage committee  Reciprocity would be a step forward, because right now, the rules are not reciprocal.

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  There are ongoing discussions. At the moment, I think that the key focus is the fact that all Canadian TV package subscribers receive multiple U.S. services, whereas only a very small percentage of American stations do.

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  —for everything they produce, and obviously local television is a creative industry. They employ people in the creative—

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  From our perspective, the Broadcasting Act reports through the Minister of Canadian Heritage, so we think that your study is very important and timely, and the model we're advocating, which is a retransmission consent model, would make new revenues available for Canadian broadcasters as well—

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  —and it will help bolster the sagging local state of television and offset some of the losses by creating these new commercial revenues.

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  I see your point. That's exactly right.

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  It would be my pleasure. Thank you.

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  That's an excellent question. Really, it's not a comparative market. All Canadian TV subscribers receive over-the-air American services in their packages, whereas in the U.S., it's limited to approximately 40 to 45 designated market areas, so only an estimated 500,000 to a million U.S.

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  Exactly. Yes, sir.

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  I don't think I would be in a position to comment on radio as a—

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  I think the larger and more interesting question coming forward will be that as the Americans implement this next generation's new TV standard, it's important to appreciate that for the first time, broadcast transmissions will be available not only for fixed receivers, such as your television in your living room, but for mobile receivers, including things like your phone, your autonomous vehicle and things like that.

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  If that's okay with you, I will answer in English. The border stations themselves are program rights owners, so they own the program rights—

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

Canadian Heritage committee  The Canadian retransmission regime is a hybrid, and it grew out of that subsidy model. Initially it was to provide cable subscribers with content outside the border. It goes back to a policy in the early 1970s, called the equalization of viewing policy, that we had at the time. It just meant that people across Canada were entitled to the Windsor television package, no matter where they lived.

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller

October 4th, 2018Committee meeting

Francis Schiller