Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-6 of 6
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Industry committee  I think we're here in both capacities as well, and that's why you've seen our recommendations focus on the operators of the large commercial-scale infringing piracy sites and not on any sorts of remedies that would impact end-users. I think enforcement against the illegal sites a

September 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Mark Graham

Industry committee  I'll start. I think you mentioned when you were asking the question that maybe we could do something on the injunction. What we've requested in our remarks today is that injunctive relief directly against intermediaries in the Federal Court would be a significant help on this i

September 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Mark Graham

Industry committee  We should take that away and provide some information that's more precise about where we're seeing them commonly.

September 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Mark Graham

Industry committee  I think the best examples are the illegal IPTV services, as they call them, that are sometimes being operated. Just to give you an example, these are people who set up 60 often fraudulently obtained TV receivers in basements across the country, upload all the channels to an illeg

September 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Mark Graham

Industry committee  It is, in fact. Lots of them are being identified all the time by rights holders in the system, but we don't have the remedies available now to address this.

September 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Mark Graham

Industry committee  I might add, just to put a couple of facts and figures around it, that I think these kinds of site blocking remedies are available through common law in other countries as well, like the U.K. However, they have still passed law reform to make injunctions directly available agains

September 26th, 2018Committee meeting

Mark Graham