Environment committee  You're not dealing with my question. I used to be an environmental director at a paper mill. We had a very bad effluent stream. The 1989 pulp and paper effluent regulations required us to put in a waste-water treatment plant. We spent $25 million. Our effluent went from being t

Environment committee  But you're making claims. You have to back them up.

Environment committee  Your profession is not important to me. You made a claim. Back it up.

Environment committee  Sure. Fair enough.

Environment committee  Yes, but you're avoiding my question. I'm asking about when our emissions in Canada are reduced, will the impacts that you talk about, fires and floods, be ameliorated by the CO2 reduction, in Canada only.

Environment committee  Thanks. Mr. Boag, you're not going to have to worry about building new refineries once Bill C-69 is passed, so you can put that out of your company's business strategy. I bristle when CO2 is termed a pollutant. We're all exhaling it right now. It's the first molecule in the pho

Environment committee  Excuse me, but I don't have much time. I understand what you're saying, but what I'm asking for is an answer based on physics and atmospheric chemistry. I want to know the molecular interactions that will happen as a result of a carbon tax in Canada—and in Canada alone, I might

Environment committee  It's great to be here.

Environment committee  You're far too kind.