Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 61-75 of 136
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Human Resources committee  If we were to take out “oral” and just say “allow arguments”, make that plural, then I think that's probably the simplest way of addressing it and allowing the intent that Ms. Falk put forward.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  We're not exactly where we started.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  And we took “oral” out.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  Thank you for bringing that up.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  If we were to replace “allow oral” with “accommodate or accept arguments” that would accommodate arguments that he or she considers necessary for the purpose of the appeal.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  Despite the principles and brilliance of the original intent, it has been pointed out to me that it is not consistent with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal. I would recommend that we withdraw and replace.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  It would be subclause 106(1.1): An appeal shall be on the merits based on the record of the proceedings before the Accessibility Commissioner, but the member or panel of members of the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal shall allow oral argument and, if he, she or it considers it n

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  My belief is that sign language will be accepted within that, as part of that.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  This is consistent with the discussion we've just had. It puts us in line with the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal and subclause 104(1.1) would read: The appeal lies on any ground of appeal that involves a question of law or fact alone, or a question of mixed law and fact, inclu

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  The goal should be 12:30.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  Higher expectations.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  I'm in agreement with a number of the principles that have come forward, but the procedure or the placement of them becomes questionable, whether it's legislation, regulation, or as we heard yesterday, with respect to accreditation and the other areas and responsibilities that th

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  More than 50% of the CASDO board is made up of with disabilities, so they're the face and the voice of making some of these decisions. If we're looking at the continuum, when a person with disabilities is applying for something, I think it's pretty clear that those people would n

November 7th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

November 7th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg

Human Resources committee  As I heard the explanation, nobody with a disability would be approaching this; these are done through organizations. Is that correct, Mr. Van Raalte?

November 7th, 2018Committee meeting

Gordie Hogg