Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 29
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  No. It's a code you don't understand as politicians, and you'll never understand it unless we start to have some of the conversations that are meant to be had between us. Anne Kelly's decisions.... You must first understand that we have a history. She sat here before you on Tues

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  You won't be able to help a single person here.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  No. It was I who did this, with the help of the John Howard Society.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  I would have loved that. I would have loved to bring evidence to the committee today.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  It also gives the consequence that you have to get in trouble in order to get programming. What about the rest of the population? I've been the rest of the population while people are getting in trouble, so what about me? I'm to be discriminated against because you're supplying m

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  Yes, we have a history.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  I'll speak on all realms, although I do not like to touch on protective custody issues. I will touch on them to give you clarity for the rest, and for the safety of other individuals, but I don't like speaking outside of a code—a prisoner code.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  It's used punitively as well.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  I would like to help you.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  As a former federal prisoner, I'll give you my personal view on the legislation as it stands from paragraph 31(3)(a) all the way through to, I believe, sections 38 to 42, which is the area in which we deal with administrative segregation of federal prisoners. I'm not going to spe

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  They're only made internally and we believe that—

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  —utilizing the mechanism of the disciplinary court and meshing the two would formulate the outside intervention that you need, the independent, impartial adjudicator who already acts as a lawyer for the disciplinary court and allows you the process to be protected by counsel and

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  Yes, it eliminates segregation. It eliminates administrative segregation and it eliminates disciplinary segregation all at once, with the description of the charges you should be placed in segregation for. This is very dangerous because when it comes to the inmate parole system,

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  No, it doesn't. The discretion has been abused. The discretion has been—

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva

Public Safety committee  We believe that will only be utilized against violent offenders, but eventually we'll be the outcasts of everything.

November 8th, 2018Committee meeting

Lawrence Da Silva