Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 451-465 of 552
Sort by relevance | Sorted by date: newest first / oldest first

House debate  Madam Chair, it would be a pleasure. As the Prime Minister has stated, we are the party of the charter and we will defend individual rights at every stage. With respect to the particular process that is now going on in Quebec, it is within the purview of the national assembly in

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, I would clarify that at the time I gave that answer to the hon. member, I was not the Minister of Justice. What I said about the article remains true.

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, I dispute the figures that were used in that question. I read the same article and those are not the figures I recall. As I have said, we set up a rigorous process for the appointment of judges through judicial appointment committees across Canada that evaluate cand

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, it is a right to donate to political parties in Canada and we have made appointments of people from all political parties. I appreciate that the “orange party” has never been great at math, and that certainly was clear this evening. We have set up a rigorous appoint

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, I will take the matter under review. However, the intentions of the chief justice of Canada are quite honourable. When I was a professor of law at McGill, the Quebec Court of Appeal began to sit once a year in the moot court of the law faculty at McGill. It was an ou

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, as I have stated this evening to a question by one of my colleagues from this side of the House, I am looking at that matter very carefully and understand its importance.

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, I stand by my previous answer and the citation of my views in the press that the hon. member mentioned. It was accurate. I am watching the situation very carefully.

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, I thank the hon. member for his work. Our government is proud to have delivered on one of its key promises to strengthen our laws on impaired driving by punishing more severely those who are driving while impaired by alcohol or drugs. This has been the first signifi

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, mandatory alcohol screening will support the police in deterring and detecting impaired driving. The evidence clearly demonstrates that mandatory alcohol screening will deter impaired driving and save lives. The law does not give police any more powers than they al

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, as with any criminal offence, the police have the power to investigate a possible impaired driving offence at someone's home. However, the police, as they did before this legislation existed, have to form reasonable grounds to believe that the driver has committed th

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, as I had begun to state in one of my previous answers, this kind of legislation already exists in 16 states in the United States. It exists in Ireland, where it is credited for saving lives. It has been tested in the United States under American constitutional law, a

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, an obvious example is that the person is not going to drive a car. If someone is going to get behind the wheel of a car and take command of a motor vehicle, it is reasonable to expect that the person might be pulled over, particularly if he or she was also consuming

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, I believe that those hon. members may contribute later on this evening, but we will see what happens. Mandatory roadside testing is seen as an efficient way to police our roads and make driving safer. The kinds of provisions that we have placed in Bill C-46, which i

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, as one of the first jurisdictions to legalize cannabis, we began the process first of all by consulting. The Minister of Border Security, as he then was, consulted across Canada. We are currently testing two devices under my jurisdiction in order to get us past the f

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal

House debate  Madam Chair, I reject the premise of the question. As I have said a number of times this evening, the director of the Public Prosecution Service of Canada said, twice, that there was no political interference. The prosecutor in the Vice-Admiral Norman case said the same thing. I

May 14th, 2019House debate

David LamettiLiberal