Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-27 of 27
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Fisheries committee  I answered that in my statement. The answer is no and I'm going right from your testimony from the RDG. They refused to even acknowledge the majority of the problems we are identifying here, in their testimony to you and so did the east coast fellow. He didn't identify the owner-

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards

Fisheries committee  No, I don't think it's that so much; it's actually who went out into the market and bought it. They own it, essentially. I mean, nothing is really owned in the Canadian context. It's all still a Canadian resource, but it's basically de facto ownership as soon as it's able to be

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards

Fisheries committee  That's what we've been putting some recommendations on the table for, trying to develop a way to share that revenue fairly. We've put forward recommendations like that. There are other potential ways to do it over time. You can, over time, develop an owner-operator kind of framew

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards

Fisheries committee  What we found in the last eight or nine months is a growing realization, and I think a lot of it came out of this committee. You listened to a lot of young fishermen from B.C. who were saying that they are not able to get into the fishery. A lot of the fishermen, even the quota h

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards

Fisheries committee  They don't track ownership, no.

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards

Fisheries committee  You have to have a licence, but the question is who owns the licence. Where's the money coming from? It could be a shell company, and there's no real tracking of that. You have to attach the licence to a quota, but that doesn't really tell you much. It doesn't tell you who actual

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards

Fisheries committee  Well, you don't. You do it on a percentage basis. What's happening right now is that people are paying up front—$5 or $6 a pound—and the processor is going to get caught in a bind just as much as the fishermen can, because the market can fluctuate. They have no real knowledge o

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards

Fisheries committee  It's the quota holder.

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards

Fisheries committee  Yes, there's just been an analysis done on that. There are 435 halibut licences, just as an example; only 140-some-odd vessels fished last year. There are a lot of these empty licences. They only have about 0.01% of the quota on them. They're now being used as quota transfer lice

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards

Fisheries committee  There is no transparent quota transfer mechanism available. There have been a number of attempts to try to build one privately. It hasn't worked. Quite often either people know somebody who knows somebody who has quota. That's how it works, or fishing processing companies would

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards

Fisheries committee  I've spent a lot of years in British Columbia dealing with interest-based negotiation frameworks with several fleets. Basically I would say that you would use a process like that, and that kind of process is based on interest-based negotiations and it has to be transparent. You

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards

Fisheries committee  Thank you for allowing me to be a witness at the parliamentary fisheries committee on this critically important topic. I'm appearing before you as an independent small boat owner-operator from British Columbia. You are going to hear from a number of young harvesters in the next

February 5th, 2019Committee meeting

Dan Edwards