Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 91-95 of 95
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Citizenship and Immigration committee  There would be an elaboration of that, for example, in our program delivery instructions. We also regularly engage and work with non-governmental organizations or service delivery providers, settlement-providing organizations, to actually provide more clarification on the paramet

May 6th, 2019Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Thank you, Minister. In terms of section 91, which sets out the requirement, it is around immigration advice or representation. That would be actually advising on someone's application or representing them in their application before us or before tribunals such as the Immigratio

May 6th, 2019Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Citizenship and Immigration committee  In our view, we would likely believe that does constitute advice if you're trying to provide advice on a certain outcome, rather than, for example, transcribing within a form or translating—

May 6th, 2019Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Citizenship and Immigration committee  It would depend on which recourse was at issue at that moment.

May 6th, 2019Committee meeting

Natasha Kim

Citizenship and Immigration committee  Perhaps I can elaborate on my earlier comments where the actual requirement around the prohibition on giving advice or representation on an immigration application, that's set out in section 91 of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act—

May 6th, 2019Committee meeting

Natasha Kim