Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-8 of 8
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Safety committee  Thank you. I can confirm that section 734.5, which is referred to in proposed subparagraph 2.3(b)(iv) in the amendment, is the ability to recover a fine civilly. Section 734.6 is the ability to refuse a permit or licence. Those are two abilities that a federal or provincial gove

May 27th, 2019Committee meeting

Ari Slatkoff

Public Safety committee  That's correct. It's just the ability to make the fine still payable and to refuse permits and licences.

May 27th, 2019Committee meeting

Ari Slatkoff

Public Safety committee  I'm not aware of the information-sharing practices in provincial governments, but there is a requirement to keep the record separate, but for those narrow exceptions.

May 27th, 2019Committee meeting

Ari Slatkoff

Public Safety committee  No, the effect of the record suspension is still that it is only with respect to the payment of fines that persist. The other effects of the record suspension are valid and will exist for individuals. It would not turn up.

May 27th, 2019Committee meeting

Ari Slatkoff

Public Safety committee  This amendment to proposed paragraph 2.3(b) enumerates the very limited number of situations in which certain obligations or disqualifications persist. The general effect of the record suspension, that it be kept separate from other criminal records, applies in all situations. Th

May 27th, 2019Committee meeting

Ari Slatkoff

Public Safety committee  I'm not sure I fully understand the question. The intention of this amendment is simply to preserve the enforceability of the fine civilly. There's no other effect of the conviction.

May 27th, 2019Committee meeting

Ari Slatkoff

May 27th, 2019Committee meeting

Ari Slatkoff

Public Safety committee  I just need a moment to attend to your question, please.

May 27th, 2019Committee meeting

Ari Slatkoff