Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.
Environment committee It's absolutely false to draw any conclusions about provincial burdens on one province or another.
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee Mr. Vellacott, there is absolutely nothing in this bill that talks about how the burden or how the responsibility would be distributed.
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee We cite a number of economic modelling studies but none that relate specifically to meeting the target we advocate for Canada in 2050. To my knowledge, that hasn't been done, and it needs to be done.
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee At the very end of the year.
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee I don't remember any specific meetings or interaction with the government of the day about the report, but I think we were almost into the election campaign at the time of the release, November 23, 2005.
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee Well, I won't comment further on the different criticisms there have been of Canada. I think you've all seen that in the media. One way the government could approach this is to say that the targets and policies we've advanced to now are a starting point. They're what we're will
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee It's not fair to say it's unanimous. It's a target, actually, that the European Union adopted as long ago as 1996, over 10 years ago, so this has been around for a long time. What really struck me in the last little while is that leading climate scientists who used to be very cau
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee There has been a lot of new science on climate change. By and large, it has been very much pushing in the direction of raising our level of alarm, raising the sense of urgency that we should have, and it is a fact that the IPCC fourth assessment report, third volume, which came o
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee I think that it is crucial for the whole world to aim at stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that will meet the objective of the framework agreement, in order to prevent dangerous climatic changes.
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee In the documents that the government has published, there is reference surrounding the government's 2020 target for Canada's emissions. There is reference to preliminary economic analysis, but there are very few details given. I think it's a very interesting question to see wheth
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee I don't believe that any government of Canada to date has yet proposed or committed to greenhouse gas targets based on science. Speaking to the targets that the present government has laid out for Canada's emissions by 2020 and 2050, there are no public documents, to my knowledg
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee Thank you. Good afternoon, and thank you for having me again. I'd like to start by congratulating Mr. Layton for his leadership and his vision in introducing this bill. To my knowledge, it's the first attempt to ensure that Canada is legally required to do its fair share toward
December 11th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley
Environment committee In the IPCC reports from this year, the IPCC makes recommendations on the amount of reductions in global emissions to get to certain temperature ranges, for example. And then there is modelling that disaggregates that into developed countries, different categories of developing c
November 27th, 2007Committee meeting
Matthew Bramley