Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 61-75 of 122
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Environment committee  Thank you for that opportunity. I did want to respond to something Mr. Warawa said. He took issue with my comments about the government's approach to the clean development mechanism. What I said was that the government was unwilling to put any public money into the green clean

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  Perhaps one thing to highlight would be the fact that close to 50% of our greenhouse gas emissions come from heavy industry in Canada. We need a much more ambitious regulatory framework that would have far fewer loopholes and targets expressed in absolute terms, not in terms of

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  Some of those countries, yes, have objectives that are compatible with the scientific recommendations. From a policy standpoint, you have to look at them more closely.

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  I'm talking about the policies put in place. In Europe, in general, they acted much sooner and more vigorously. That was the case, for example, with regard to the promotion of renewable energies and energy efficiency, but much remains to be done, of course.

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  At the Pembina Institute, we aren't—

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  If France's emissions are already quite low because it uses nuclear energy on a massive scale, it is all the more difficult for it to adopt an additional 75% reduction target for its emissions. A country like Canada, whose missions are very high, has, from a certain standpoint, m

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  No, the statements made about the targets or commitments that the Prime Minister wants to see for developing countries seems to indicate a very rigid position without acknowledging the nuance that there are these vast disparities between different kinds of countries. I can't imag

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  Let's start with the targets. The document that I've distributed, but that you perhaps haven't received, contains a table. Our document on Bali is on our Web site. In it we compare the targets of various countries. Germany's target, for example, is to reduce its emissions by 40%

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  The statements have been made in some speeches. Essentially, Canada's position to date, as far as we know it, is that we want a new international agreement that cuts global emissions in half by 2050. That was in the throne speech. It has binding targets that apply to all major em

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  I think Canadians want us to be at the forefront of solving the problem. The kind of position it seems the Prime Minister took at the Commonwealth summit doesn't look like Canada being at the forefront of solving the problem. We always question the developing countries having dif

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  That's difficult to answer. Clearly, there's a lot of concern about the attitude of the Government of Canada to our existing obligations under the first phase of Kyoto. The government has made clear that it's not going to attempt to comply. Regulations will only be implemented

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  The principle of common but differentiated responsibility you're referring to appears in both the Kyoto Protocol and the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. That convention is still the framework for those negotiations. We must clearly continue to apply this principle, whi

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  A section in my submission addresses the question of Canada's credibility and it contains some of the elements you mentioned. Certainly, a series of studies have attempted to assess the policies the government has announced to date to see whether they are strong enough to meet th

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  Can I wrap up in 20 seconds?

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley

Environment committee  Thank you. Going in to Bali, I think there are serious questions over Canada's level of ambition. The government's attitude to the first phase of Kyoto, the ambiguity over two degrees, the government's targets, the government's 2020 targets in particular, we've compared in our s

November 27th, 2007Committee meeting

Matthew Bramley