Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 46-53 of 53
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Justice committee  Thank you, Madam Chair. To understand exactly how paragraph 2 would read after the amendments, I'm going to read it to make sure I understand it properly. It would be for proposed subsection 62.1(2), “Tabling of report”: The Minister shall cause a copy of any report received

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Thank you, Mr. Fortin.

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  I can answer this question, Madam Chair. In the French version, there is no need to have a change to replace the second “should”, because it's already included in the first one. In French it says, “dans lequel il précise”. It's the report that we're talking about, the one that

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Yes, indeed, you are right.

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  Mr. Fortin has an amendment just before amendment PV-3.

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  I won't comment on the impact; that would be more of a legal question that the department may weigh in on. In terms of procedural admissibility, they're fine.

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

Justice committee  PV-1 indicates “which includes”, so it's not limited to the list that follows. It includes the list plus whatever needs to be added to the list. The same goes for LIB-2, which indicates “assault law and social context, which includes systemic racism and systemic discrimination”

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla

October 27th, 2020Committee meeting

Philippe Méla