Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 1-15 of 84
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Canada-China Relations committee  Of course. (Motion agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4)

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  Mr. Chair, I have Mr. Chong in the room.

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  No worries. That's what I have.

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  Yes, that's correct.

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  I have “and to report to the committee on the fairness of it”. Is that correct?

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  Please correct me if I'm wrong. The motion would read, “That the unredacted documents from the Public Health Agency of Canada be provided to the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel within 10 days to review and ascertain the fairness of them and to report to the committee on the

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  Okay. It continues: And should the documents not be provided, that the committee report the following to the House: Your committee recommends that an Order of the House do issue for all information and documents, in the care, custody or control of the Public Health Agency of Ca

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  I can confirm that we looked on ParlVU to see what Ms. Zann did say. I can confirm that she said “to review and ascertain the fairness of them”.

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  Yes, absolutely. It would have the headline that says “Special Committee on Canada-China Relations” and then the text of the motion.

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  Yes. I do have it here. We're essentially taking the b) from the motion that was adopted on March 31, 2021, and just replacing the b) from the amendment from Mr. Genuis as a subamendment. When we are doing motions in this committee, we don't need to put the name of the committe

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  The additional text would be “to review and ascertain the fairness of them”, speaking of the redactions that were made.

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  What I read previously was, “That the unredacted documents from the Public Health Agency of Canada be provided to the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel.” I do have another part, “to review and ascertain”, and then I am missing additional words.

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk

Canada-China Relations committee  Yes, absolutely. The first motion moved by Ms. Zann was, “That the unredacted documents from the Public Health Agency of Canada be provided to the Law Clerk and Parliamentary Counsel.” It's very possible that I missed the last part, but that was the version I had. I have the a

May 10th, 2021Committee meeting

The Clerk