Canadian Heritage committee  Yes. I did say that.

Canadian Heritage committee  “If needed”, in this case, means we have a broad mandate to look at the broadcasting system in Canada. We're at the front end of this. There was a question raised about whether podcasting impacts the broadcasting system in Canada. We have no specific questions about it right now.

Canadian Heritage committee  Yes, absolutely. We're a quasi-judicial tribunal, and I can't speak to a theoretical for the future—

Canadian Heritage committee  Yes.

Canadian Heritage committee  My apologies—I'm not sure which document you are referring to. If you're referring to the registration consultation as a whole, we could address that, but I apologize, I'm not aware of the context of your question.

Canadian Heritage committee  What we've asked for in that decision is to collect basic information on podcast services. That is literally your legal name, your address and how we can get in contact with you. That is all we're asking for. That gives us the ability to collect information down the line, if we n

Canadian Heritage committee  Not even that.

Canadian Heritage committee  We're asking podcast services, a few of whom you can imagine have revenues of over $10 million a year—we're not even sure if there are podcast services who have over $10 million a year in Canada—to register with us to just let us know “we are a service that provides that”. We're

Canadian Heritage committee  Absolutely nothing.

Canadian Heritage committee  No.

Canadian Heritage committee  No.

Canadian Heritage committee  No.

Canadian Heritage committee  That is absolutely correct.

Canadian Heritage committee  That is correct.

Canadian Heritage committee  We obviously and clearly have a role in news and broadcasting, which we take very seriously, but it's important to note the difference between Bill C-11 and Bill C-18. Bill C-11 gives us large policy questions. There are a number of policy objectives, and we have to figure out ho