Foreign Affairs committee  Thank you for the question. Yes, we've recently changed our travel advice to advise Canadians that they should depart the country. Part of that is based on.... There are currently flights available, but changing circumstances could start to limit those. There is the freedom of movement that Paul described.

Foreign Affairs committee  Thank you. I can take that one. Yes, the commitment was $300 million over three years. I would just add that that was not just spending in Myanmar. In fact, the majority of the spending was actually in Bangladesh to provide support in Cox's Bazar.

Foreign Affairs committee  We are on track to disburse all of that funding by the end of this fiscal year.

Foreign Affairs committee  I can take that question, Mr. Chair. Precisely in Rakhine.... I can only give it to you at the country level, so it would be the amount that we would have been spending in Myanmar.

Foreign Affairs committee  It's approximately.... Funding is from a base level of $15 million to, with some of the additional funding that was provided through the crisis response, approximately $40 million a year over the three years.

Foreign Affairs committee  Go ahead, Paul.

Foreign Affairs committee  I think I can clarify. Yes, we provided advice to our ministers and are awaiting decisions.

Foreign Affairs committee  Thank you, Chair. Just for the purposes, then, of the record, Paul indicated that our three-year strategy was coming to an end at the end of this month but that we have provided advice to the government on the next phase of that strategy to support the Rohingya people, and we are awaiting the government's decision on that.

Foreign Affairs committee  Yes. Thank you, Paul. The central element is the military. We need to take into account the fact that, despite being on the path to democracy, there was always a structured democracy so that the military would retain control. In the current constitution, a certain percentage of the seats in parliament were retained by the military.

Foreign Affairs committee  To answer you specifically, we've seen from them some movement in terms of, for example, their position in dealing with Rohingya issues, as part of an effort, I think, to acknowledge that that has been a weakness for them in the past. In terms of their commentary on a federal state, for the most part, the main line of communication has been to respect the outcome of the November 2020 election where, as Paul mentioned earlier, they had an overwhelming majority.

Foreign Affairs committee  Thank you, Mr. Chair. To follow on Paul's comments which were focused on ethnic armed organizations, I think the same conclusions apply across ethnic communities. It's a volatile picture with different groups, communities and regional differences in terms of approach and [Technical difficulty—Editor].