Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 16-20 of 20
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Public Accounts committee  Very quickly, we've actually done follow-up with our U.S. counterparts as well as with our U.K. and European Union counterparts to look into potential indicators for how we can improve our measurements of the oversight regime, including by potentially leveraging some best practic

May 6th, 2021Committee meeting

Michael DeJong

Public Accounts committee  Again, I would fall back on the requirements of the key trains and key risk rule. In order to determine whether it's adequate, CN is responsible for conducting a risk assessment to determine whether or not their current training measures are appropriate to the level of risk on

May 6th, 2021Committee meeting

Michael DeJong

Public Accounts committee  Thank you for the question. I'll answer it in a couple of parts. One is with respect to the support that Transport Canada provides, and second is the requirements of the “key train and key routes” that CN must fulfill in this corridor because it is identified as a key route. Tr

May 6th, 2021Committee meeting

Michael DeJong

Public Accounts committee  Thanks for the question. Essentially, the sample showed that we are collecting a wealth of information from railway companies, including information on operating characteristics, traffic patterns, tonnage and previous incidents. As the deputy minister mentioned, however, to use

May 6th, 2021Committee meeting

Michael DeJong

Public Accounts committee  Thank you for the question. I would simply point out that with respect to our oversight regime in that northern B.C. corridor, we're taking a number of active measures to address the risks that have been identified, including front-ending a number of our inspections in that area

May 6th, 2021Committee meeting

Michael DeJong